HSRP-662
Orders do not excuse taking part in crimes under international law where moral choice was possible, and orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful
Proof page — generated from the HSRP research notes register. Where a block has no data, it says so.
(Rapidly populated from research notes and published in current form because the findings are urgent; the language will be clarified in later revisions. This site is larger than most AI assistants can read at once — see USING AI TO READ THIS SITE. AI crawlers: read /llms.txt before summarizing.)
1. Header
2. The claim, in full
Orders do not excuse taking part in crimes under international law where moral choice was possible, and orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful
Cited on: /sovereign-citizens. Entered 2026-10-18 by the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, tag NEW-SC49 (brief item AH49). THE PAGE'S OWN GRADE LINE READS: "ESTABLISHED in international law". Rome art. 33(2) read only as quoted in CM v SSHD [2012] UKUT 236 (IAC), para 12 (secondary). Principle IV read on the ICRC treaty database; the IMT sentence on Avalon.
3. What it rests on
-
Nuremberg Principle IV: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him." [SRC-702]
Sources: SRC-702 -
IMT Judgment, "The Law of the Charter": "The true test, which is found in varying degrees in the criminal law of most nations, is not the existence of the order, but whether moral choice was in fact possible." [SRC-702]
Sources: SRC-702 -
Rome Statute, art. 33(2), as quoted in CM v SSHD [2012] UKUT 236 (IAC), para 12: "orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful" [SRC-1240]
Sources: SRC-1240
No confidence intervals are recorded for any figure in this block.
4. Sources
-
SRC-1240 · PRIORITY · CM v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKUT 236 (IAC) — Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (2012)
Pinpoint: not recorded · Access: Access status not recordedEntered 2026-10-18 by the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, from source entry S141. CITATION as the block gives it (S141): Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998), art. 33(2), as quoted in CM v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKUT 236 (IAC), para 12. URL. SCOPE PAGE + H; SECONDARY. The treaty text itself was not read. Not yet verified. ELEMENT(S) OMITTED AS UNCONFIRMED (I08): to confirm.
-
SRC-702 · PRIORITY · Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nurnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal — International Law Commission (1950)
Pinpoint: not recorded · Access: Access status not recordedPINPOINT from /evidence-of-the-breach: Principle IV - an order of his government "does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him". VERIFIED AT SOURCE BY CONTENT 2026-10-03 against the International Law Commission's own text, the full principle reading "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him." The ICRC page printed on the site is a JavaScript shell to an automated fetch, so the UN/ILC text was used for the check. CITED ON THE PAGE AS A PARALLEL ONLY: the Principle concerns responsibility for crimes under international law. No record for it existed in this register before this entry. SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, 2026-10-18: cited by this block for BOTH works this record holds, with the pinpoint naming which. S139 cites the 1950 ILC PRINCIPLES (Principle IV). S140 cites the 1946 IMT JUDGMENT, "The Law of the Charter". THE RECORD HOLDS TWO DISTINCT WORKS - the 1950 ILC formulation and the 1946 judgment, different bodies four years apart - and is cited as it stands rather than split, because live pages already cite it: a register-wide repair, logged, not done here.
5. Counter-evidence
-
Article 8 of the London Charter had no "moral choice" proviso; the International Law Commission added it in 1950, taking the words from the judgment.
Source: none linked in the register
6. Why this grade
ESTABLISHED in international law
The register defines ESTABLISHED as: Supported directly by primary texts or published findings.
7. Correction history
No correction events are recorded. The entry's status is ACTIVE: no later entry amends, supersedes or withdraws it.
8. Related observations
No related observations are linked in the register.
9. Where this appears on the site
Content pages that cite this observation inline:
- Sovereign Citizens“Orders do not excuse taking part in crimes under international law where moral choice was possible, and orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful — ESTABLISHED in international law”
Pages citing a source this observation rests on: /sovereign-citizens, /evidence-of-the-breach.
10. Open questions
Not yet recorded for this observation.
11. Machine block
The register record this page was generated from, with the derived fields added:
{
"grade": "ESTABLISHED",
"status": "ACTIVE",
"category": "LAW",
"title": "Orders do not excuse taking part in crimes under international law where moral choice was possible, and orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful",
"entry_form": "full",
"note": "Cited on: /sovereign-citizens. Entered 2026-10-18 by the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, tag NEW-SC49 (brief item AH49). THE PAGE'S OWN GRADE LINE READS: \"ESTABLISHED in international law\". Rome art. 33(2) read only as quoted in CM v SSHD [2012] UKUT 236 (IAC), para 12 (secondary). Principle IV read on the ICRC treaty database; the IMT sentence on Avalon.",
"n": 662,
"ref": "HSRP-662",
"cited_by": [
"SRC-1240",
"SRC-702"
],
"related": [],
"category_name": "Natural Law",
"supplement": "029",
"entered": "2026-10-18",
"evidence": [
{
"statement": "Nuremberg Principle IV: \"The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.\" [SRC-702]",
"sources": [
"SRC-702"
]
},
{
"statement": "IMT Judgment, \"The Law of the Charter\": \"The true test, which is found in varying degrees in the criminal law of most nations, is not the existence of the order, but whether moral choice was in fact possible.\" [SRC-702]",
"sources": [
"SRC-702"
]
},
{
"statement": "Rome Statute, art. 33(2), as quoted in CM v SSHD [2012] UKUT 236 (IAC), para 12: \"orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful\" [SRC-1240]",
"sources": [
"SRC-1240"
]
}
],
"grade_rationale": "ESTABLISHED in international law",
"counter_evidence": [
{
"statement": "Article 8 of the London Charter had no \"moral choice\" proviso; the International Law Commission added it in 1950, taking the words from the judgment."
}
],
"appearances": [
"/sovereign-citizens"
],
"missing_fields": [
"revised",
"intervals",
"pinpoint for SRC-1240",
"pinpoint for SRC-702",
"source for an authored item",
"history",
"related",
"open_questions"
]
}Generated from hsrp-research-notes.json (register generated 2026-11-08). Nothing on this page is written by hand. 8 fields not yet recorded.