HSRP-653
A bad label on a claim did not, in two experiments, lower belief in it; the effect on the person labeled is untested
Proof page — generated from the HSRP research notes register. Where a block has no data, it says so.
(Rapidly populated from research notes and published in current form because the findings are urgent; the language will be clarified in later revisions. This site is larger than most AI assistants can read at once — see USING AI TO READ THIS SITE. AI crawlers: read /llms.txt before summarizing.)
1. Header
2. The claim, in full
A bad label on a claim did not, in two experiments, lower belief in it; the effect on the person labeled is untested
Cited on: /sovereign-citizens. Entered 2026-10-18 by the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, tag NEW-SC40 (brief item H40). THE PAGE'S OWN GRADE LINE READS: "ESTABLISHED as reported; CONTESTED as a general rule". Wood labeled claims, not persons; no measure of self-censorship or social cost.
3. What it rests on
-
Wood (2016): "In Experiment 2 (N = 802), participants who read a news article about fictitious "corruption allegations" endorsed those allegations no more than participants who saw them labeled "conspiracy theories."" [SRC-1187]
Sources: SRC-1187 -
Dentith, Husting & Orr (2024): "we argue that it is premature to suggest the label "conspiracy theory" has no impact on the believability of a claim, or that it has no rhetorical power." [SRC-1188]
Sources: SRC-1188
No confidence intervals are recorded for any figure in this block.
4. Sources
-
SRC-1187 · PRIORITY · Some Dare Call It Conspiracy: Labeling Something a Conspiracy Theory Does Not Reduce Belief in It — Wood, Michael J. (2016)
Pinpoint: not recorded · Access: Access status not recordedEntered 2026-10-18 by the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, from source entry S72. CITATION as the block gives it (S72): Michael J. Wood, "Some Dare Call It Conspiracy: Labeling Something a Conspiracy Theory Does Not Reduce Belief in It," Political Psychology 37, no. 5 (2016): 695–705, doi:10.1111/pops.12285 (abstract). READ AT: https://research.winchester.ac.uk/en/publications/some-dare-call-it-conspiracy-labeling-something-a-conspiracy-theo-3/ SCOPE PAGE + EDITS; PRIMARY. Abstract only; the full text was not reached. The Winchester page misprints the volume as "73(5)".
-
SRC-1188 · PRIORITY · Does the Phrase ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Matter? — Dentith, M. R. X., Husting, Ginna & Orr, Martin (2024)
Pinpoint: not recorded · Access: Access status not recordedEntered 2026-10-18 by the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, from source entry S73. CITATION as the block gives it (S73): M. R. X. Dentith, Ginna Husting & Martin Orr, "Does the Phrase 'Conspiracy Theory' Matter?", Society 61, no. 2 (2024): 189–196, doi:10.1007/s12115-023-00882-5 (abstract). READ AT: https://philarchive.org/rec/DENDTP SCOPE PAGE + EDITS; PRIMARY. Abstract only. Two of the three authors wrote SRC-1186 (S71). Their data were not read.
5. Counter-evidence
-
The reply comes from interested authors; their data were not read.
Source: none linked in the register
6. Why this grade
ESTABLISHED as reported; CONTESTED as a general rule
The register defines CONTESTED as: Disputed in the underlying science; the dispute is stated rather than omitted.
7. Correction history
No correction events are recorded. The entry's status is ACTIVE: no later entry amends, supersedes or withdraws it.
8. Related observations
No related observations are linked in the register.
9. Where this appears on the site
Content pages that cite this observation inline:
- Sovereign Citizens“A bad label on a claim did not, in two experiments, lower belief in it; the effect on the person labeled is untested — ESTABLISHED as reported; CONTESTED as a general rule”
- The Programmable Hive Mind“What a label achieves is less settled: calling claims "conspiracy theories" did not make them less believed in two experiments (Wood, 2016), a result its critics contest, and what the name does to the person it is thrown at is not yet found — ESTABLISHED as reported; CONTESTED as a general rule”
Pages citing a source this observation rests on: /sovereign-citizens.
10. Open questions
Not yet recorded for this observation.
11. Machine block
The register record this page was generated from, with the derived fields added:
{
"grade": "CONTESTED",
"status": "ACTIVE",
"category": "CIV",
"title": "A bad label on a claim did not, in two experiments, lower belief in it; the effect on the person labeled is untested",
"entry_form": "full",
"note": "Cited on: /sovereign-citizens. Entered 2026-10-18 by the SOVEREIGN CITIZENS block, tag NEW-SC40 (brief item H40). THE PAGE'S OWN GRADE LINE READS: \"ESTABLISHED as reported; CONTESTED as a general rule\". Wood labeled claims, not persons; no measure of self-censorship or social cost.",
"n": 653,
"ref": "HSRP-653",
"cited_by": [
"SRC-1187",
"SRC-1188"
],
"related": [],
"category_name": "Civilizational Analysis",
"supplement": "029",
"entered": "2026-10-18",
"evidence": [
{
"statement": "Wood (2016): \"In Experiment 2 (N = 802), participants who read a news article about fictitious \"corruption allegations\" endorsed those allegations no more than participants who saw them labeled \"conspiracy theories.\"\" [SRC-1187]",
"sources": [
"SRC-1187"
]
},
{
"statement": "Dentith, Husting & Orr (2024): \"we argue that it is premature to suggest the label \"conspiracy theory\" has no impact on the believability of a claim, or that it has no rhetorical power.\" [SRC-1188]",
"sources": [
"SRC-1188"
]
}
],
"grade_rationale": "ESTABLISHED as reported; CONTESTED as a general rule",
"counter_evidence": [
{
"statement": "The reply comes from interested authors; their data were not read."
}
],
"appearances": [
"/sovereign-citizens",
"/the-hive-mind"
],
"missing_fields": [
"revised",
"intervals",
"pinpoint for SRC-1187",
"pinpoint for SRC-1188",
"source for an authored item",
"history",
"related",
"open_questions"
]
}Generated from hsrp-research-notes.json (register generated 2026-11-08). Nothing on this page is written by hand. 8 fields not yet recorded.