HSRP-514
For many partisans a party is a group they belong to, and the strength of that identity predicts their campaign work better than their issue views do.
Proof page — generated from the HSRP research notes register. Where a block has no data, it says so.
(Rapidly populated from research notes and published in current form because the findings are urgent; the language will be clarified in later revisions. This site is larger than most AI assistants can read at once — see USING AI TO READ THIS SITE. AI crawlers: read /llms.txt before summarizing.)
1. Header
2. The claim, in full
For many partisans a party is a group they belong to, and the strength of that identity predicts their campaign work better than their issue views do.
Cited on: /the-hive-mind, THE PARTY HIVE MIND › Party as identity. Entered 2026-10-12 with the /the-hive-mind rewrite; tag NEW-W2d-1.
3. What it rests on
-
For many partisans a party is less a set of policies than a group they belong to. Political scientists measure this with statements such as "When people criticize this party, it feels like a personal insult" and "If this party does badly in opinion polls, my day is ruined" [SRC-938] [SRC-939]. In US studies by Leonie Huddy, Lilliana Mason and Lene Aarøe, the strength of that identity predicted people's campaign work better than the strength of their views on the issues, and strong identifiers met the threat of their party's defeat with more anger than weak ones [SRC-938]. The authors call it "expressive partisanship". The same measure carries over to the Netherlands, Sweden and Britain, where several parties compete [SRC-939].
Source: none linked in the register -
Party as identity is marker M6 in WHAT A HIVE MIND IS: the view marks membership, and an attack on the party lands as an attack on the self.
Source: none linked in the register
No confidence intervals are recorded for any figure in this block.
4. Sources
No source is linked to this observation in the register.
5. Counter-evidence
-
The limits matter as much. Identity strength varies, and the effects sit mostly in strong identifiers.
Source: none linked in the register -
The account describes a mode any partisan can enter, not every member of a party.
Source: none linked in the register
6. Why this grade
The argument for this grade has not yet been recorded for this observation.
The register defines PROBABLE as: Well supported, but an interpretation or connection across sources rather than something a source states directly.
7. Correction history
8. Related observations
- HSRP-414 · PROBABLE · THE TWO HIVE MINDS: party loyalty in the United States works as a social identity, and voters largely follow it. Rests on: the publisher's description of Achen and Bartels, Democracy for Realists (2016) (voters choose "on the basis of social identities and partisan loyalties, not political issues"; the book itself not opened); Finkel and fourteen co-authors, Science 370 (2020) (political sectarianism defined at p. 533; "cold feelings toward the out-party now exceed warm feelings toward the in-party", p. 533; a majority-party candidate "could get elected despite openly violating democratic principles", p. 535, reporting Graham and Svolik 2020, not opened); Rathje, Van Bavel and van der Linden, PNAS 2021 (each out-group term raised the odds of a post being shared by 67%, from the abstract, which gives n = 2,730,215; observational; sharing, not votes). Washington's Farewell Address (1796) is quoted as a text, the two fragments being the opening and closing words of one sentence. Against, carried on the page: Druckman, Green and Iyengar (2023) found "scant evidence of a direct link between affective polarization and democratic backsliding in the U.S." That the two party hive minds are steered by design is not yet found, and it is not yet known whether it will be found; what is found is an incentive that rewards hostility. The model of the hive mind is this site's own, set out on /the-hive-mind, whose section 9 is "THE TWO-PARTY ARCHITECTURE", and on /psycho-vulgarism.Relation: not recorded
- HSRP-515 · PROBABLE · In the United States party now lines up with ideological, racial and religious identity, a "mega-identity" that raises bias and anger even where views are no more extreme.Relation: not recorded
9. Where this appears on the site
Content pages that cite this observation inline:
- The Programmable Hive Mind“For many partisans a party is a group they belong to, and the strength of that identity predicts their campaign work better than their issue views do — PROBABLE”
10. Open questions
11. Machine block
The register record this page was generated from, with the derived fields added:
{
"grade": "PROBABLE",
"status": "ACTIVE",
"category": "LAW",
"title": "For many partisans a party is a group they belong to, and the strength of that identity predicts their campaign work better than their issue views do.",
"entry_form": "full",
"note": "Cited on: /the-hive-mind, THE PARTY HIVE MIND › Party as identity. Entered 2026-10-12 with the /the-hive-mind rewrite; tag NEW-W2d-1.",
"n": 514,
"ref": "HSRP-514",
"cited_by": [],
"related": [
"HSRP-414",
"HSRP-515"
],
"category_name": "Natural Law",
"supplement": "027",
"evidence": [
{
"statement": "For many partisans a party is less a set of policies than a group they belong to. Political scientists measure this with statements such as \"When people criticize this party, it feels like a personal insult\" and \"If this party does badly in opinion polls, my day is ruined\" [SRC-938] [SRC-939]. In US studies by Leonie Huddy, Lilliana Mason and Lene Aarøe, the strength of that identity predicted people's campaign work better than the strength of their views on the issues, and strong identifiers met the threat of their party's defeat with more anger than weak ones [SRC-938]. The authors call it \"expressive partisanship\". The same measure carries over to the Netherlands, Sweden and Britain, where several parties compete [SRC-939]."
},
{
"statement": "Party as identity is marker M6 in WHAT A HIVE MIND IS: the view marks membership, and an attack on the party lands as an attack on the self."
}
],
"counter_evidence": [
{
"statement": "The limits matter as much. Identity strength varies, and the effects sit mostly in strong identifiers."
},
{
"statement": "The account describes a mode any partisan can enter, not every member of a party."
}
],
"open_questions": {
"falsify": [
"As a whole, the account would be wrong if party identity predicted nothing that agreement on policy does not, or if partisans who agree on outcomes trusted one another across the aisle."
]
},
"history": [
{
"date": "2026-10-13",
"event": "BATCH 3 of the /the-hive-mind slimming: explanation moved here from WHERE YOU'LL FIND IT, CULTS, THE PARTY HIVE MIND or THE RELIGIOUS HIVE MIND",
"reason": "wording unchanged except as listed: \"This is marker M6 in WHAT A HIVE MIND IS:\" → \"Party as identity is marker M6 in WHAT A HIVE MIND IS:\" (opening demonstrative); \"This describes a mode\" → \"The account describes a mode\" (opening demonstrative). The page's reference numbers were converted to SRC numbers at extraction."
}
],
"appearances": [
"/the-hive-mind"
],
"missing_fields": [
"entered",
"source for an authored item",
"source for an authored item",
"intervals",
"sources",
"source for an authored item",
"source for an authored item",
"grade_rationale",
"relation to HSRP-414",
"relation to HSRP-515"
]
}Generated from hsrp-research-notes.json (register generated 2026-10-13). Nothing on this page is written by hand. 10 fields not yet recorded.